[daip] [!14796]: AIPS - Unstable phases on the GBT
James Miller-Jones
nraohelp at nrao.edu
Wed Sep 25 05:11:22 EDT 2019
James Miller-Jones updated #14796
---------------------------------
Unstable phases on the GBT
--------------------------
Ticket ID: 14796
URL: https://help.nrao.edu/staff/index.php?/Tickets/Ticket/View/14796
Name: James Miller-Jones
Email address: james.miller-jones at curtin.edu.au
Creator: User
Department: AIPS Data Reduction
Staff (Owner): Amy Mioduszewski
Type: Issue
Status: Open
Priority: Default
SLA: NRAO E2E
Template group: Default
Created: 17 September 2019 01:09 PM
Updated: 25 September 2019 09:11 AM
Resolution due: 19 June 2022 12:00 AM (997d 14h 48m)
Dear Amy,Thank you very much for your response. I had a go at this, and was able to correct the GBT for part of one of the two affected epochs. BS228E had pulse-cal data for GBT for the whole experiment, the delays derived from the PC data were very scattered (by +/-5ns) up until 07:53 UT (about three-quarters of the way through the experiment), at which point they stabilised to a reasonable steady value. Applying the phase referencing solutions to my check source, I was able to get good results when including the GBT after 07:53, but not before that.For BS228F, on the other hand, there only appeared to be a single PC record for GB for the entire experiment, so no correction was possible.I assume that this is now as good as we will be able to do. However, if it is possible to recover PC information from elsewhere (especially for BS228F), or if you know why the PC table should have shown these delay jumps for BS228E, then please let me know.Best regards,James
------------------------------------------------------
Staff CP: https://help.nrao.edu/staff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/daip/attachments/20190925/cd0719cd/attachment.html>
More information about the Daip
mailing list