[daip] [!10581]: AIPS - Unexpected results from VLBACCOR on VLBA data
NRAO Helpdesk
nraohelp at nrao.edu
Mon Jun 26 10:42:38 EDT 2017
Amy Mioduszewski updated #10581
-------------------------------
Staff (Owner): Amy Mioduszewski (was: -- Unassigned --)
Unexpected results from VLBACCOR on VLBA data
---------------------------------------------
Ticket ID: 10581
URL: https://help.nrao.edu/staff/index.php?/Tickets/Ticket/View/10581
Full Name: Tanmoy Laskar
Email: tlaskar at cfa.harvard.edu
Creator: User
Department: AIPS Data Reduction
Staff (Owner): Amy Mioduszewski
Type: Issue
Status: Open
Priority: Default
SLA: NRAO E2E
Template Group: Default
Created: 25 June 2017 04:13 PM
Updated: 25 June 2017 04:13 PM
Due: 28 June 2017 02:42 PM (2d 0h 0m)
Resolution Due: 04 July 2017 12:00 AM (7d 9h 17m)
Hello,
I am attempting data reduction for VLBA project BL230 using the AIPS VLBAUTIL procedures, and have run into a curious issue while attempting to correct for errors in the sampler threshold using ACCOR. The steps taken were:
1. Load data into AIPS using VLBALOAD
2. Correct the Earth Orientation Parameters using VLBAEOPS (CL1)
3. Remove delays due to ionospheric dispersion using VLBATECR (CL2)
4. Decimate the data by a factor of 10 for processing using AVSPC (CHANNEL=10) and selecting only calibrator sources (CL3)
5. Attempted to derive sampler corrections using VLBACCOR.
This last step generates SN1 & CL4. Upon plotting the resulting SN table, we find our solutions to be milligains ~ 2300 (see attached plot), regardless of the time range or source selected and solution interval employed. The expected values of the gain is order unity (milligain ~ 1000 rather than ~ 2300), and I am concerned about these differences. Is this a significant issue, and if so, what must be done differently?
Thanks for your help,
Tanmoy Laskar
Jansky Fellow
NRAO & Berkeley
------------------------------------------------------
Staff CP: https://help.nrao.edu/staff
More information about the Daip
mailing list