[daip] [!8171]: AIPS - REWAY
Lynn Matthews
do-not-reply at nrao.edu
Wed Mar 16 19:34:56 EDT 2016
Lynn Matthews updated #8171
---------------------------
REWAY
-----
Ticket ID: 8171
URL: https://help.nrao.edu/staff/index.php?/Tickets/Ticket/View/8171
Full Name: Lynn Matthews
Email: lmatthew at haystack.mit.edu
Creator: User
Department: AIPS Data Reduction
Staff (Owner): -- Unassigned --
Type: Issue
Status: Open
Priority: Default
SLA: NRAO E2E
Template Group: Default
Created: 16 March 2016 11:34 PM
Updated: 16 March 2016 11:34 PM
Due: 18 March 2016 11:34 PM (2d 0h 0m)
Resolution Due: 24 March 2016 11:34 PM (8d 0h 0m)
While investigating the problems that led to my earlier ticket on GETJY, I skipped the use of TYAPL on my data and instead used REWAY to calibrate the weights.
I used the recommended APARM values given in the AIPS Cookbook (APARM=11,30,12,0,10,4). I have used this task before with apparent success, but discovered something that left me worried.
Initially, I forgot to flag my target source. I ran SPLIT and REWAY, then imaged. Afterward, I went back and flagged a bad antenna and repeated these steps. However, IMEAN claimed the noise in my new image was 50% higher.
I tried a similar experiment on completely unrelated data. I find that if I neglect to apply flags, the resulting image of the REWAYed data clearly looks much noisier than the case where I applied the flags, but IMEAN or IMSTAT will report that the RMS is much smaller and the entire amplitude scale is shifted.
The question I have now is whether REWAY is really giving me the right amplitude scale even when I have flagged carefully.
Lynn
------------------------------------------------------
Staff CP: https://help.nrao.edu/staff
More information about the Daip
mailing list