[daip] [!8707]: AIPS - Can IMEAN ‘histogram’ RMS be written into ACTNOISE?
Robert Gray
noreply at nrao.edu
Wed Jul 20 17:27:25 EDT 2016
Robert Gray updated #8707
-------------------------
Can IMEAN ‘histogram’ RMS be written into ACTNOISE?
---------------------------------------------------
Ticket ID: 8707
URL: https://help.nrao.edu/staff/index.php?/Tickets/Ticket/View/8707
Full Name: Robert Gray
Email: roberthansengray at gmail.com
Creator: User
Department: AIPS Data Reduction
Staff (Owner): -- Unassigned --
Type: Issue
Status: Open
Priority: Default
SLA: NRAO E2E
Template Group: Default
Created: 20 July 2016 09:27 PM
Updated: 20 July 2016 09:27 PM
Due: 22 July 2016 09:27 PM (2d 0h 0m)
Resolution Due: 28 July 2016 09:27 PM (8d 0h 0m)
Hi!
I’m working on an AIPS procedure to run SAD on each channel of an image cube, using the RMS for each channel (rather than the global RMS in ACTNOISE) for both (1) setting a series of successively declining thresholds, and (2) getting the RMS value used included in SAD’s output report.
The method I’ve arrived at is to run IMEAN on each channel and have it write the RMS into ACTNOISE, then run SAD which automatically reports ACTNOISE in its print file (so I can calculate SNR later) and which I use to set threshold levels. Seems to work fine! It nearly doubles execution time, but I can live with that if necessary. I could not make PUTHEAD write IMSTAT’s ‘pixstd’ into the header ACTNOISE, which might have been faster, and I could not PUTHEAD a -1 or 0 into ACTNOISE to force SAD to calculate an RMS for each channel (as you seemed to have suggested).
One drawback is that strong sources jack up the RMS reported by IMEAN and written into ACTNOISE. Is there a way to get the ‘histogram’ RMS written into ACTNOISE instead?
Best wishes,
Bob Gray
------------------------------------------------------
Staff CP: https://help.nrao.edu/staff
More information about the Daip
mailing list