[daip] strange DELAY error

[Eric Greisen]

Andrew Biggs wrote:
> Hi Eric. The reason I was ending up with different numbers of CC tables is
> because I was running CCEDT with up-to-date (often smaller or fewer) clean
> boxes. If a facet has no clean components, CCEDT will not write a new CC
> table. Also, when peeling a source, I run CCEDT on it with a very high
> CUTOFF to ensure that the new CC table has no clean components. Therefore,
> when I subtract all the facets, this one is not subtracted and I don't
> have to run UVSUB twice i.e. it doesn't need to be added back in like in
> PEELR. This saves time and seems better in terms of not doing any more to
> the data than absolutely necessary.
> 
> I can be more careful from now on if the above is asking for trouble.
> Before running CCEDT, I used to copy CC1 to CC2 for all facets and set
> OUTVER=2 - this ensured that all facets had the same number of CC tables.

I am nervous about changes in bottom level routines used everywhere just 
before a 3-week vacation.  I have actually edited the routines that I 
think are or may be(in other circumstances) the culprits and will put 
them in the system early in April.  Be careful until then.

Cheers

Eric Greisen