[daip] Curious problem with INDXR/CLCAL...

Nissim Kanekar nkanekar at ncra.tifr.res.in
Thu Dec 12 08:41:06 EST 2013


Hi Eric,

Great, many thanks indeed! I'll just ignore the errors then...

Hope all's well with you.

Cheers,
Nissim



On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Eric Greisen wrote:

> Nissim Kanekar wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>> 
>> I'm running INDXR (and later FRING and CLCAL) on a Q-band EVLA dataset and 
>> get the following error message:
>> 
>> GANGA > INDXR1: Task INDXR  (release of 31DEC13) begins
>> GANGA > INDXR1: A CL table already exists: a new one will not be created
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFI2: DELAY 1
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFI2: DELAY 2
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFI2: REQUEST FOR BYTES 23553 THRU = 24576
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFIO: OPER = WRIT LUN = 16 NREC =       24
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFI2: BEYOND EOF = 23552
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZERROR: IN ZFI2   ERRNO = 22 (Invalid argument)
>> GANGA > INDXR1: HIIO ON LUN, NREC     16     24 EXPAND ERROR      3
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFI2: DELAY 1
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFI2: DELAY 2
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFI2: REQUEST FOR BYTES 23553 THRU = 24576
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFIO: OPER = WRIT LUN = 16 NREC =       24
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZFI2: BEYOND EOF = 23552
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ZERROR: IN ZFI2   ERRNO = 22 (Invalid argument)
>> GANGA > INDXR1: HIIO ON LUN, NREC     16     24 EXPAND ERROR      3
>> GANGA > INDXR1: Appears to have ended successfully
>> GANGA > INDXR1: ganga 31DEC13 TST: Cpu=     57.2  Real=     62  IO= 
>> 123574
>> 
>> 
>> I get the same error on later running FRING and CLCAL, but in both cases 
>> the task claims to have ended successfully. I wondered if this was a 
>> problem with the message file and hence closed AIPS, deleted the MSD file 
>> and started AIPS again, but got the same problem. INDXR seems to run fine 
>> on other files on the same disk. I was wondering if you might have come 
>> across this error before and might know how to sort it out.
>
> My suspicion is that the history file for this data set has an indicator at 
> its start that tells it that the file is larger than it actually is.  I note 
> that subroutine HIIO updated that parameter even when the ZEXPND call had an 
> error.  That is wrong, so I have fixed it but it is too late to help this 
> file and I probably will not relink every task either.  This error is ancient 
> and rarely causes problems since ZEXPND should always work for small amounts 
> of disk.
>
> Cheers
>
> Eric Greisen
>




More information about the Daip mailing list