[daip] New Staff Reply - [!QAD-525825]: application of SN delay terms contains unwanted phase wrap

[Eric Greisen]

New Staff Reply: application of SN delay terms contains unwanted phase wrap

Although most of my arguments in the last e-mail hold, I
can see a way to manage this.  The routine that reads the
CL table converts delays into cos(delay) and sin(delay).
If I change that to keep simply delay, then the 
application routine can get the delay difference times
the channel offset as still a delay (in phase units).
This can then go to a cos/sin per channel but also be scaled
by the frequency offset to get the starting phase correctly.

I will make this change in late November.

ERic Greisen


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: QAD-525825
Department: AIPS Data Processing
Priority: Default
Status: Closed
Link:  https://help.nrao.edu/staff/index.php?_m=tickets&_a=viewticket&ticketid=451