[daip] Smearing calculation in JMFIT

Leonia Kogan lkogan at nrao.edu
Thu Feb 25 17:35:02 EST 2010


I' like to wait for the AIPS group leader Eric Greisen to answer your 
last question. He will be back from vacation this Monday.

Hi   LK

Vinodiran Arumugam wrote:
> Dear Leonia,
> 
> Thank you for your email. The reason for wanting the know the way in which 
> the beam shape is handled across the map (eg 0 to 90 degrees from y-axis 
> to x-axis), is to be able to replicate the change in the fwhm and apply it 
> to the I/Io correction for a square bandpass, in comparison to the JMFIT 
> calculation for the peak reduction using a gaussian bandpass.
> 
> Is there any way of obtaining this information?
> 
> With thanks,
> Vinod
> 
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Leonia Kogan wrote:
> 
>> Vinodiran Arumugam wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm exploring the smearing correction applied to my data to correct for the 
>>> reduction in peak fluxes. It would help if I could understand how JMFIT 
>>> varies the half peak beam width (hpbw) used in the smearing equation 
>>> (fractional bandwidth x radius in hpbw) across the map.
>>>
>>> So for an elliptical beam of bmaj = 1.82, bmin = 1.63 and bpa = -3deg, how 
>>> is the hpbw varied to use 1.82 at the nothern/southern most point and 1.63 
>>> at the eastern/western most point? What function of position and 
>>> major/minor axis is used to calculate the bandwidth smearing?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Vinod
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Daip mailing list
>>> Daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>>> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip
>> Hi Vinod,
>>
>> I have spent a time this morning looking into the codes of JMFIT.
>> Now I am ready to discuss the smearing in JMFIT.
>>
>> 1. JMFIT uses the clean beam given at the header of the image.
>> 2. This clean beam is smeared by a Gaussian in the radial direction 
>> proportional to the radius from the pointing position (center) times BWSMEAR. 
>> Typically BMSWEAR is the ratio of freq channel width to the central frequency
>> 3. All found Gaussian components are deconvolved using the relevant found new 
>> clean beam. Different clean beam is used for different components.
>> 4. You do not need to think about the beam shape at different place of the 
>> map. JMFIT takes care about this.
>>
>> I hope it will help
>>
>> Leonid Kogan
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Daip mailing list
> Daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip




More information about the Daip mailing list