[daip] CLCOR vs IMAGR for shifts

[Eric Greisen]

Mark Reid wrote:
> Eric Greisen wrote:
>> Mark Reid wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, it appears that CLCOR is still broken.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>> Not that I know of.  It took data from you to establish this fact 
>> before.  It will take more data if you really think this is the case.
>>
>> Eric Greisen
> 
> The problem you fixed earlier involved VLBA data.  That fix seemed to 
> have worked.
> 
> The recent problem is with VLA data.  I don't know if this problem is 
> related to the older one.
> 
> I don't think you need to take more data (if by take you mean observe). 
>   I would bet that any VLA-A data with a strong compact source would 
> suffice.
>

You have not understood me.  I know nothing about what you are doing - 
are you reducing q band or 4 band data?  It took you providing us your 
calibrated data set before we could find the problem last time.  And in 
finding that problem we did re-examine the code very closely and found 
nothing more to correct.  What parameters are you actually using for the 
imaging and CLCOR?

Note that I will be unavailable until March at this point.

Eric Greisen