[daip] AIPS timeout

[Eric Greisen]

Anita M. S. Richards wrote:
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> I hope that you had a good break.
> 
> I was back briefly last week and discovered that *something* seems to 
> have fixed the timeout problem, at least running in batch mode!  I am 
> now at ESO and ESA for the next fortnight but unless I break things 
> again when I get back, all I need to do now is thank you very much for 
> your help (also on behalf of a queue of MERLIN archive users...).
> 
> On a different issue, whose idea was it to insert messages like
> NO FLUX FOUND FOR CALIBRATOR SOURCE IN SU TABLE
> MODEL WILL USE THE FLUX CONTAINED IN IT ONLY
> THE USE OF GETJY AFTER THIS WILL BE INCORRECT,
> 
> and the messages for 'large' numbers of failed solutions in CALIB?

I put these in.

The first refers to the use of SETJY to set flux values and then to 
scale a model to the desired total flux.  GETJY is problematical unless 
this is doen or your model is better than most.

I have added a warning about large numbers of failed solutions because, 
if your data are good, there should not be a large number of failed 
solutions.

But what were your questions?

Eric Greisen