[daip] CALIB flagging
Eric Greisen
egreisen at nrao.edu
Tue Aug 5 19:09:34 EDT 2008
Craig Walker wrote:
> When I run CALIB without averaging polarizations and IFs on a 2 IF, full
> stokes data set, I get a flag table with some flags on each IF and with
> pol flags of the sort 1011 or 0111 as expected. When I set aparm(3)=1
> and aparm(5)=1 to average the polarizations and IF's, the output flag
> table has polarization flags 1111, as expected, but all flags are IF's 1
> trough 1. In other words, there are no flags for IF 2 even though the
> IFs have similar data and there are around 29000 flags for IF 1. I
> expected all flags to be IFs 1 through 2, or at least to have a similar
> number of IF 2 flags as IF 1 flags.
>
> I suspect the above is enough to go on to find the problem. But, if
> not, let me know and I can provide whatever is needed.
>
> This was on the Mac that looks like it was last updated on July 10.
>
The flagging routine was not told about the averaging of IFs - although
it received a magic code about Stokes averaging. I simply added the
parameter to the call sequence and when true it will flag BIF to EIF.
I did not test this - so please check that it works.
Eric Greisen
More information about the Daip
mailing list