[daip] is this a new failure mode of UVLSF ?

[Miller Goss]

Amy-thanks. I suppose that this explains the reason  that the NEW
version still works and TST does not ?
thanks
miller
ps-there were many problems with this data.


On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Amy Mioduszewski wrote:

> Hi Miller,
>
> So I have tracked down why the TST version of UVLSF died for that dataset. 
> Stokes RR for visability 85744 is all zeros for all channels, including the 
> weight.  You can check this yourself with PRTUV.  Eric's new subroutine reads 
> that and says there is no good data and croaks.
>
> I have experimented with trying to flag the offending visability but then 
> UVLSF just finds more (of two I looked at they were both RR).  I am going to 
> leave it to Eric to figure out how to deal with it since it is in a 
> subroutine he recently wrote and he will be back Monday.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Amy
>