[daip] VPLOT problem

[Eric Greisen]

------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) -------
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <egreisen at aoc.nrao.edu>
Received: from polaris.cv.nrao.edu (polaris.cv.nrao.edu [192.33.115.101])
	by dropbox.aoc.nrao.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/smtp-gateway) with ESMTP id lA6MM3iJ012598
	for <egreisen at aoc.nrao.edu>; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 15:22:03 -0700
Received: from revere.aoc.nrao.edu (revere.aoc.nrao.edu [146.88.1.15])
	by polaris.cv.nrao.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/smtp-gateway) with ESMTP id lA6MM2vf021810
	for <egreisen at nrao.edu>; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:22:02 -0500
Received: from primate.aoc.nrao.edu (primate.aoc.nrao.edu [146.88.3.100])
	by revere.aoc.nrao.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/cv-ws-8.12) with ESMTP id lA6MLulP018295;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2007 15:21:56 -0700
Received: (from egreisen at localhost)
	by primate.aoc.nrao.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id lA6MLtDQ010336;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2007 15:21:55 -0700
Message-ID: <18224.59651.953057.337017 at primate.aoc.nrao.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711061827190.13823 at vlb047.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711061827190.13823 at vlb047.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under Emacs 21.3.1
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the postmaster at aoc.nrao.edu for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-100,
	required 5, autolearn=disabled, USER_IN_WHITELIST -100.00)
X-MailScanner-From: egreisen at aoc.nrao.edu
X-Spam-Status: No
From: Eric Greisen <egreisen at nrao.edu>
To: Alexander Pushkarev <apushkar at mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: [daip] VPLOT problem
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 15:21:55 -0700

Alexander Pushkarev writes:
 > Hello,
 > 
 > I got some strange message (below) from AIPS
 > running VPLOT. The inputs were

 > >go
 > VPLOT1: Task VPLOT  (release of 31DEC07) begins
 > VPLOT1: UVGET: Using flag table version   1 to edit data
 > VPLOT1: ZABORS: signal 11 received
 > VPLOT1: ABORT!
 > AIPS 1: Resumes
 > **********************************************************************
 > 
 > 
 > The same is happening with POSSM.
 > 

Both of these tasks go through the same (calibration) code to fetch
the data.  Did you compile AIPS locally and if so which compiler did
you use and which version of that compiler?  

Try accessing these data with PRTUV and then UVPRT to see what
happens.  In general, the calibration code is well tested, but
compiler bugs often show up there.

Eric Greisen
------- end -------