[daip] task DBCON
Hermine Landt
hlandt at head.cfa.harvard.edu
Wed Sep 21 13:19:14 EDT 2005
hi Amy,
thank you for your help.
I have another question concerning imaging the combined data set. I choose
the values for BJMIN and BJMAX which give the most appropriate results,
however, I don't properly understand the significance of PA (the position
angle). Should I set it to zero? Is there a recommended value.
thanks. Hermine
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hermine Landt
Harvard-Smithsonian E-mail: hlandt at cfa.harvard.edu
Center for Astrophysics Phone: +1-617-496-7824
60 Garden Street, MS-70 Fax: +1-617-495-7356
Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~hlandt/
----------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Amy Mioduszewski wrote:
> Hi Hermine,
>
> From my experience combining different VLA configurations, it is better
> to self-cal first, then DBCON. You'll have to do some self-calibration
> after you combine them, but it is easier to get them to converge if the
> data going in is well calibrated to begin with.
>
> I've had to do lots of experimenting though. Do you have many different
> arrays? I've also found that adding arrays one at a time is the best
> way to proceed. I know it is more work, but glombing everything
> together and expecting it just to work out doesn't seem to work very
> well. I usually go from smaller configurations to larger as well, i.e.,
> self-cal everything, combine D and C, do some self-cal, add B, do some
> self-cal, add A...
>
> Also, experiment with UVBOX in IMAGR, this seems to work better
> adjusting the weighting than just adjusting ROBUST.
>
> Again, there is no perfect recipe, I'm just telling you what seems to
> work best for me. You will probably have to experiment yourself.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Amy
>
More information about the Daip
mailing list