[daip] Re: IT's definitley STRANGE UVCOP
Hans-Rainer Kloeckner
hrk at astro.ox.ac.uk
Mon Sep 12 05:36:46 EDT 2005
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Eric Greisen wrote:
> Hans-Rainer Kloeckner writes:
>
> > Sorry I'm somehow confused! I run into the
> > following problem. Using UVCOP to delete some visibilities works ONLY
> > if the BCHAN and ECHAN in the flag table is set to 1 0 otherwise UVCOP
> > does not delete anything. I did the following experiment on several
> > datasets:
> >
> > I produce 2 flag tables with UVFLG one with
> > BCHAN 0, ECHAN 0 and one with BCHAN 40, ECHAN 41.
> >
> > UVCOP only dropped some vis. records in the first case and
> > does nothing in the secound.
> >
> > Is there some hidden knowledge why? If not and I hope it's not my AIPS
> > version, do you see an easy way to fix that problem ?
> >
Hi Eric,
Thank you for your reply. You won the bet !!! So I guess a beer
or soft drink in October is on me !
cheers
hans
> In the 2nd case it will not drop a record, just flag channels 40 and
> 41 inside that record. I bet if you run PRTUV on CHANNEL=40 you will
> see that the UVCOP output has negative or 0 weight where the channel
> is to be flagged. Note that a UV data record contains all of the
> channels and will be dropped only if all of the channels (and all of
> the IFs and all of the polarizations) are flagged.
>
> Eric Greisen
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans - Rainer Kloeckner
----------------------------------------
University of Oxford
Denys Wilkinson Building
Keble Road
Oxford OX1 3RH
United Kingdom
-------------------------
surface : room 705
phone : +44 (0)1865 2-73435 [office]
fax : +44 (0)1865 2-73390
email : hrk at astro.ox.ac.uk
----------------------------------------
More information about the Daip
mailing list