[daip] Re: SNFLG gripe

[Lincoln Greenhill]

Hi Eric,

> >From appearance you are leaving FLAGVER=0 and so each execution is
> adding to a previous FG table - hence the smaller numbers.

I just reviewed my SNFLG settings via a TGET.  I do set FLAGVER to 2 and
3 in my tests.

I am a confused by your reference to smaller numbers. I apply SNFLG to
SN3, and whether I flag jumps of 170 degrees or 90 degrees, I seem to 
have the same number of visibilities after I apply the flag tables in 
SPLIT.

> What impressed me with a 170 degree cutoff was to +- 300 degree jumps
> in the table.  The code needs (and now has in 31DEC04 as of
> tomorrow's MNJ) more statements saying if > 180 subtract 360 and vice
> versa.

Ah. Glad you caught that.

Regards,

Lincoln

-- 

Lincoln J. Greenhill               Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Office:     1 617-495-7194         60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
Cell:       1 617 851 8918         E-mail:  greenhill at cfa.harvard.edu
FAX:        1 617-495-7345         http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~lincoln

Through July 2004: Kavli Institute, Stanford University, 
                   Box 20450, Mail Stop 29
                   Stanford, CA 94309
                   Cell: 1 617-851-8918
                   FAX:  1 650-926-8570