[daip] Re: AR504

[Data Analysts]

----- Begin Included Message -----

>From larry at astro.umn.edu Tue Feb 11 11:56 MST 2003
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:56:33 -0600
From: Lawrence Rudnick <larry at astro.umn.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Data Analysts <analysts at zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU>
Subject: Re: AR504v3
References: <200302111817.LAA22861 at aspen.aoc.NRAO.EDU>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1, required 7,
	REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,
	X_ACCEPT_LANG)
X-Lines: 31
Status: RO

Meri - thanks.  I experimented with the
online fillm, with whatever is running now, and
it seems fine.  if i understand correctly,
i could mess things up if i simply even
look at the data set while things are actually
filling.
   is this true?  or only if i
do anything specific to write?
   if i use the stop and restart option,
do i lose anything with dbconning later
on to put the whole day back together?
   do i need to bring in any other external
files (gain, etc) as part of the fillm?
   do you recommend getting rid of shadowing
during fillm (i would probably get rid of
anything shadowed at all, so would just
leave cparm(4) 0.
   [it's really unfortunate that different
language about shadowing is used in
observe and fillm. the former talks about
'amount of shadowing' e.g., 2 meters,
and the latter talks about 'baseline
length', where presumably anything less
than 25 meters is shadowed.]

thanks.

lr





----- End Included Message -----