[daip] Re: DELZN, CLCOR suggestions

Leonia Kogan lkogan at aoc.nrao.edu
Wed Aug 27 11:12:21 EDT 2003


----- Begin Included Message -----

>From daip-admin at donar.cv.nrao.edu Fri Aug 22 15:26 MDT 2003
From: Leonia Kogan <lkogan at aoc.nrao.edu>
To: reid at cfa.harvard.edu
Cc: daip at bonito.aoc.nrao.edu
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Subject: [daip] Re: DELZN, CLCOR suggestions
Sender: daip-admin at donar.cv.nrao.edu
X-BeenThere: daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:daip-request at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu>
List-Subscribe: <http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip>,
	<mailto:daip-request at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: This is the designated AIP list for AIPS support. <daip.listmgr.cv.nrao.edu>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip>,
	<mailto:daip-request at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/pipermail/daip/>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:24:45 -0600 (MDT)
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster at cv.nrao.edu for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.7, required 7,
	BAYES_01 -5.40, KNOWN_MAILING_LIST -0.30)
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2018
X-Lines: 59
Status: RO


Mark,

 > 1) One really needs a way to edit out bad data.  
 >    I'm analyzing a data set that has a few discrepant
 >    points and they totally control the fits.
 >    I suggest iterating and down-weighting discrepant
 >    points.  I can send you more information if you
 >    want on how I go about this.

I thought about that and came to conclussion that it should be done outside 
of the DELZN using SNEDT for example.
Let me think about that more.

  >2) Since the choice of a reference antenna is really
  >   unimportant, it would be nice for all printout 
  >   to treat the reference antenna as just another
  >   antenna.

It is in DELZN already if there is more than one reference antenna.
The plots for reference antenna are created only if one reference antenna 
is used for all data.

  >3) I don't see how OPTY='PHAS" can be useful. 
  >   Basically that must assume that all delays are
  >   smaller than light travel over 1/2 a wavelength.
  >   This will probably never happen.  The risk of
  >   having this option is that someone will use it 
  >   and get solutions that are wrong.

I agree. I'll remove this option.

  >4) It would be nice to get the OUTFILE without
  >   having to generate a CL-table.

There is some logic relation of OUTFILE and CL table in DELZN.
I'll change this

>CLCOR:

>   1) One very useful option for CLCOR would be to
>      add a CALSOUR parameter.  This would indicate
>      the phase reference source for phase-referenced
>      observations.  When CALSOUR(1) is specified,
>      the corrections should be those for the source
>      observed, SOURCE(n), minus those for CALSOUR(1).
>      Currently, one must apply the full corrections
>      to all sources, then re-FRING the CALSOUR, and
>      then apply the phases to the SOURCES.

Do you mean to add ADVERB CALSOUR for any CLCOR's option or only ATMO?

Leonia


_______________________________________________
Daip mailing list
Daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip


----- End Included Message -----




More information about the Daip mailing list