[daip] bad amplitude
Data Analysts
analysts at aoc.nrao.edu
Mon Sep 23 12:26:16 EDT 2002
----- Begin Included Message -----
>From chris at nac.oa.uj.edu.pl Mon Sep 23 06:54 MDT 2002
From: Krzysztof Chyzy <chris at oa.uj.edu.pl>
Subject: bad amplitude
To: analysts at cv3.cv.nrao.edu
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:54:07 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Lines: 74
Status: RO
Dear Analyst,
I'm not sure if you have got my previous e-mail about some problems with
data reduction so I enclose it again below. I will appreciate
very much if you can help.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Forwarded message:
> From chris Sun Sep 15 15:49:16 2002
> Subject: bad amplitude
> To: analysts at nrao.edu
> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 15:49:16 +0200 (CEST)
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
> Content-Length: 2015
>
> Dear Analyst,
>
> In our recent project AU88-01 we observed with the VLA D-config.
> in C-band a dwarf galaxy IC10. Our study is mainly devoted to detailed
> polarization study of this BCG galaxy so we obtained 3 times
> 8h observing time on: 4 Dec 01, 28 Dec 01, 31 Dec 01 to make
> a sensitive search for regular magnetic fields.
>
> The data quality from the first two days are acceptable, but I cannot
> properly calibrate the data from 31 Dec to have similar results to
> the first 2 days. Some numbers to show possible error of the corruption
> (the data were carefully inspected and flagged):
>
> 4 Dec 28 Dec 31 Dec
>
> getjy task 3.74Jy 3.75Jy 8.18Jy
> sour 3C138
>
> getjy task 1.14Jy 1.13Jy 2.04Jy
> sour 0059+581
> (phase calibrator)
>
> task edita 60-70A 60-70K 60-160(or -200)K - all antennas!
> range of Tsys
>
> tvstat, IC10, 1.2e-5Jy 1.2e-5Jy 3.1e-4Jy
> rms in TP map
>
> total flux 152mJy 150mJy 221mJy
> IC10 less extended
> structure visible
>
> The SN table (also TY) shows a gradual huge increase of the signal (amplitude)
> from the beginning (31 Dec 2001 20:29) up to about the middle of the
> observation (01 Jan 2002 00:30) and then similar decrease to the end of the
> observing run (01 Jan 2002 04:28). From the observing log I know that it was
> snowing and for a half of hour the operator was running the SNOW program to
> dump snow from dishes.
>
> Could you advise me what to do, please? At this stage the data from the
> third day is useless. What was the cause of this big rise and the fall down
> of the amplitude? The phase signal is O.K.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Krzysztof T. Chyzy e-mail: chris at oa.uj.edu.pl
> Astronomical Observatory uochyzy at cyf-kr.edu.pl
> Jagiellonian University
> ul. Orla 171, 30-244 Krakow, Poland
> tel (+48 12) 4121771
> fax (+48 12) 4251318
>
>
----- End Included Message -----
More information about the Daip
mailing list