[daip] TAMGR

[Jim Ulvestad]

I'm all in favor of putting VLBAMCAL into VLBALOAD.
We tried in the past to get Chris to put the table
merging into FITLD; he had some claimed scientific
reason why this wasn't always a good idea, but I
think the real (and understandable!) reason was that
he didn't want to complicate FITLD any more.

jim

Amy Mioduszewski wrote:
> 
> I have been thinking about the multiple questions these
> days about problems with the GC and TY tables because people
> are not running TAMRG.  I know, these people are idiots and
> should read the documentation, but it did occurred to me that
> there is no reason that VLBAMCAL shouldn't be part of VLBALOAD.
> Is there any good reason for the separation?  It would be
> fairly easy, to check the loaded file to see if there were
> GC and TY tables and if NCOUNT was > 1 then run TAMRG.   The
> only question I see is whether the data has to be sorted and
> have and NX table for TAMRG to work.  As far as I can tell
> from the TAMRG help file this is not the case.
> 
> Amy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Daip mailing list
> Daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip