[daip] UVFLG's gripe
Leonia Kogan
lkogan at aoc.nrao.edu
Thu May 10 13:31:49 EDT 2001
Dear Lincoln,
Yes, you right.
UVFLG does not permit to flag by INFIL and elevation in the same run.
But not only that:
UVFLG does not permit to flag by INFIL and anything yet(times, IFS, antennas..)
in the same run.
This is the logic of UVFLG: if(infile) then only infile.
I think there is a sence in this logic. Is not it?
Let me think about other options
Leonia
----- Begin Included Message -----
>From owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu Thu Apr 19 12:20 MDT 2001
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:19:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lincoln Greenhill <lincoln at rgalp8.harvard.edu>
To: aipgripe at zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU, aipsmail at cv3.cv.nrao.edu, daip at cv3.cv.nrao.edu,
egreisen at cv3.cv.nrao.edu, pmurphy at cv3.cv.nrao.edu
Sender: owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 491
X-Lines: 15
Status: RO
Subject: aips_gripe
{19-APR-2001 14:15:59}
{rgalp8 UN-REGISTERED!!!!!!!}
{ 24 31DEC01 DEC}
{lincoln greenhill}
{cfa}
{617 495 7194}
{UVFLG does not permit me to flag by INFIL and elevation in the same run.
I have verified that I can use two consecutive runs to achieve the
desired flagging. When both things are requested, the elevation flagging
is not done.
}
{When INFIL and elevation are specified to UVFLG, elevation flagging is not done}
{greenhill at cfa.harvard.edu}
{ }
----- End Included Message -----
More information about the Daip
mailing list