[daip] GETJY question

Leonia Kogan lkogan at aoc.nrao.edu
Tue Jul 3 23:39:06 EDT 2001


Hi Jessica,

You may forget including your secondary calibrator (0024-420) at 
the list of CALSOURs at VLACALIB.

Leonia


----- Begin Included Message -----

>From owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu Tue Jul  3 14:57 MDT 2001
X-Authentication-Warning: leavitt.Colorado.EDU: jrosenbe owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 14:53:34 -0600 (MDT)
From: "Jessica L. Rosenberg" <jrosenbe at casasrv.colorado.edu>
X-X-Sender:  <jrosenbe at leavitt.Colorado.EDU>
To: <daip at cv3.cv.nrao.edu>
cc: Jessica Rosenberg <jrosenbe at casasrv.colorado.edu>
Subject: [daip] GETJY question
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Lines: 28
Status: RO

Hello,
  I am in the process of reducing some continuum data and I seem to be having a
problem with getting GETJY to run properly and I am not sure what the problem
is. I have run SETJY on the primary flux calibrator and everything seemed to
have gone okay. It reported the correct flux for the calibrator and all. I also
ran VLACALIB without a problem - a very few minor closure errors. So everything
was looking good. I then ran GETJY and although there were no "errors," the
flux of the calibrator was not computed. The message file reported:

leavit> GETJY1: Task GETJY  (release of 31DEC01) begins
leavit> GETJY1:    Source:Qual      CALCODE IF  Flux (Jy)
leavit> GETJY1: 0024-420        :600   A     1    0.00000 +/-  -1.00000
leavit> GETJY1:                              2    0.00000 +/-  -1.00000
leavit> GETJY1: WARNING: All requested fluxes were NOT determined.
leavit> GETJY1: Appears to have ended successfully
leavit> GETJY1: leavitt      31DEC01 TST: Cpu=       0.1  Real=       2


I assume that there is something that I have missed doing or some reason that
the information needed for GETJY is not complete, but I can't figure out what it
could be. Any suggestions as to what could be going wrong or what I can do to
make GETJY assign a flux to this calibrator would be greatly appreciated.


					Thanks,
					Jessica




----- End Included Message -----




More information about the Daip mailing list