[daip] buglet in DBCON
Leonia Kogan
lkogan at aoc.nrao.edu
Tue Apr 24 10:31:25 EDT 2001
Hi Clair,
My first impression is that your second order is not 'recomended' by UBCON.
Having combined sequentely N single source files DBCON creates data with
N subarrays (N AN files). Each new single file data is interpreted by
DBCON as the new subarray and concatanetes it as N+1 subarray.
Probably DBCON is not so smart to add N sabarray data to a 1 subarray data.
Let me look more to the problem if another aipser does not find solution
earlier.
Chaps #1 Leonia
----- Begin Included Message -----
>From owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu Mon Apr 23 18:19 MDT 2001
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:19:28 -0600 (MDT)
From: Claire Chandler <cchandle at aoc.nrao.edu>
To: daip at habanero.aoc.NRAO.EDU
Subject: [daip] buglet in DBCON
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Lines: 23
Status: RO
chaps,
I have eleven UV files I'm trying to combine with DBCON and I find that I
get different results depending on the order in which I combine them.
when I do the following everything seems alright:
inname = output of previous DBCON
in2name = output of SPLIT ...etc for all 11 files
but unfortunately this is not what I did the first time around, where
instead I did
inname = output of SPLIT
in2name = output of previous DBCON
and then bizarre things started happening to the data, and in particular,
when I plotted some of the resulting subarrays using VPLOT, a few (but not
all) of the baselines were offset in time by 5 days, and antennas with
these baselines exhibit strange gains for the offset times. I can show
this to anyone who might be interested...
Claire
----- End Included Message -----
More information about the Daip
mailing list