[asac] Enhanced sciences with ACA?
Seiichi Sakamoto
seiichi at nro.nao.ac.jp
Mon Sep 17 23:01:25 EDT 2001
Dear ASAC members:
In the Santiago face-to-face meeting, relatively high priority was
assigned to ACA based on rather vague feeling. This is potentially
of severe concern to ALMA, because the full scope of the enhancement
may be threatened if we fail to present strong science cases for
ALMA+SD+ACA that cannot be realized with ALMA+SD. Here I summarize
some of my comments/concerns and TBDs on the science cases for ACA
in the following. I hope this helps a bit to finalize the ASAC
report. Any comments and corrections are welcome.
(1) General comments/concerns:
- Mass and motion of the objects are two of the most important
parameters in observational astrophysics. How ACA is related to
these parameters? Accurate imaging does not mean robust extraction
of mass distribution. What is the importance of extremely high
fidelity images probed by molecules other than molecular hydrogen?
- What fraction of ALMA users really takes advantages of the extremely
high fidelity of ALMA+SD+ACA? Is it of higher priority than to
ensure routine high fidelity imaging with ALMA+SD to all users?
- How easily will we lose the gain achieved with ACA by degrading the
SD observations or by inappropriate deconvolution algorisms?
(2) Line ratios:
- In multi-line analyses, ambiguity of chemical abundances, complexity
of the objects, unmatched synthesized beams, inhomogeneity of
physical conditions in the synthesized beam, and robustness of the
model used (e.g., LVG) often limit the robustness of conclusions.
We should evaluate what level of fidelity is necessary/sufficient
for this kind of analyses, and what level of fidelity can be
achieved for realistic cases (noise for realistic integration times
and source strengths).
- We should explain why extremely high fidelity is preferred rather
than number of bands (or number of observable lines) that also
enhances ability of multi-line observations.
(3) Arm-to-interarm contrast:
- Fidelity of images at extremely high level may not be the limiting
factor that controls conclusions. The arms of spiral galaxies are
not always well-defined, and identification of arms may limit the
robustness. The situation becomes more difficult for flocculent
galaxies. We should examine if different researchers independently
obtain consistent value of the arm-to-interarm contrast with sample
images to the accuracy of current interest.
- Uncertainty due to ambiguous luminosity-mass conversion may also
play a major role.
(4) Mass spectrum of clouds and cores:
- Ken Tatematsu's analysis at the face-to-face meeting clearly
demonstrated that ALMA+SD already realizes enough fidelity for this
purpose. In realistic cases, complexity of the objects (cloud/clump
overlapping, irregular structure, etc.) and robustness of simple
finding algorisms (e.g., CLUMPFIND) may limit the results.
- Uncertainty due to ambiguous luminosity-mass conversion may also
play a role.
- We should find other cases in which extremely high fidelity is
needed.
(5) Polarization:
- Polarization study seems among which ACA might play a role. We need
examples that clearly demonstrate this. We should be sure that ACA
supports polarization capability under severe budgetary constraints
if we are to stress this science case.
(6) Submillimeter observations:
- Smaller diameter of ACA antenna may be suitable for submillimeter
observations. However, current situation suggests that
submillimeter receivers that enable submillimeter observations may
be competitive with ACA. We should justify why we prefer ACA rather
than Band 8 if we are to stress this science case.
- If we are to stress this science case, optimization of the array
diameter, number of antenna, and configuration may be needed,
because the current optimization is based on imaging capability.
With best,
Seiichi
==========================================
Seiichi Sakamoto
------------------------------------------
ALMA-Japan Project Office
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan
phone: +81-422-34-3843
fax: +81-422-34-3764
e-mail: seiichi at nro.nao.ac.jp
URL: http://www.nro.nao.ac.jp/~seiichi
------------------------------------------
More information about the Asac
mailing list