[alma-config]Reconfiguration Times
John Conway
jconway at oso.chalmers.se
Mon Apr 15 19:16:38 EDT 2002
Hi,
I have been studying the timeline document Max Kraus
left on a 'strawman' scheme for reconfiguration using 2
transporters which then gives a total of 4 moves per work day
(i.e. 2 moves/antenna/day). This scheme assumes 1 hour driving
time (or 20km if the desired loaded speed or 20km/hr is
achieved).
Members of the configuration group wondered
how the claimed move rate of 2ant/day/transporter
fitted in with the spec of 20- 30 minutes to pick up and set
down antennas. According to Project book section 4.2.14
the requirement is that
'....when the transporter arrives to
pick up a maximum 20 minutes elapses before the transporter
leaves loaded with an antenna, and when it sets down a maximum
of 30 min is allowed between when the transporter arrives
at a pad and when it is ready to depart...'.
In fact the estimate Max gives (see details below) is more or
less consistent with
that spec (he allows 30 min dead time for the transporter at
both set up and set down), if we also assume a drive time of 1hour
for the transporter.
In his scheme, he has two driver teams and two antenna
teams, one such team dedicated to preparation of an antenna
for moving prior to transporter arrival and then loading onto
transporter the other team doing unloading and installation.
The two specialised teams travel quickly from pad to pad
doing their specialised functions. This saves man-hours - having
fixed teams associated with each transporter wastes man-hours
since they have to spend the time in the cab while the transporter moves
from pad to pad. In Max's scheme all the personnel work 6hrs
at the site, though they start at staggered times. I have adapted
his scheme slightly, I have included time for the specialised teams
to move between pads, also I have included time for the transporter
to move to the first pad at the start of the day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Reconfiguration schedule, moving 4 antennas per day
using two transporters.
Each symbol between hyphens is assumed to take 0.5hrs.
Prep/Load team Tr-Pr-L1-Tr-Pr-L2-Tr-Pr-L3-Tr-Pr-L4
Transporter 1 Tu-Tu-L1-Tl-Tl-U1-Tu-Tu-L3-Tl-Tl-U3
Transporter 2 Tu-Tu-L2-Tl-Tl-U2-Tu-Tu-L4-Tl-Tl-U4
Unload/Install team U1-In-Tr-U2-In-Tr-U3-In-Tr-U4-In
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key
Pr - prep team 'shuts down' antennaprepares antenna for arrival of
transporter.
In - Install team sets up new antennas (i.e. get it ready for observations
after transporter leaves)
Tr - prep or install team travels - uses fast vehicle (30-40km/hr)
Ln - Load antenna 'n' onto transporter.
Un - Unload antenna 'n' onto pad.
Tu - Transporter travels to next pad - unloaded
Tl - Transporter travels to next pad - loaded
Using the above scheme all crews/drivers work 6hrs at the site
-------------------------------------------------------------------
One can question whether Preparation of antenna for move
and Installation take less than 0.5 hrs assumed - it would be
nice to decide the spec for that. I didn't see anything in the
project book, maybe there is something in the Antenna design
documents. These in any case however don't effect the reconfiguration
rate until 'Pr' and 'In' exceed half the drive time. Also the target
goal for unloaded transporter motion twice that for
loaded motion (50km/hr) so 'Tu'
could be reduced. However the work sequences of the eams
have to synchronised or the man-hours and operations costs go up
- hence small adjustments like that don't effect the overall
reconfiguration time.
Fundamentally in the above scheme there are 2 moves/ant/day
because for each move there is 1hr travel (unloaded), 0.5hr pick
up, 1hr travel (loaded), 0.5hr set down = 3hrs/move and a 6hr
work day at the site.
Its important to understand the travel time numbers
for the compact array, how careful do we have to drive?
To go 200m at walking pace 5km/hr takes only 2 minutes.
All the time lost is in acceleration-deceleration,
aligning on approach lasers, checking that
blocking antennas are moved out of the way etc, etc.
Despite the small distance I can't
believe that the drive time in the crowded compact array
when we are moving between antennas with metre
clearance can safely be lower than 0.5hrs?? In this
case we can achieve 3 moves/transporter/day - and we
probably need another preparation/installation crew.
If the time to load and unload an antenna on a transporter
can be reduced to 15 minutes and in the compact array
drive times are 30 minutes, then we can achieve
one reconfiguration per transporter in 90 minutes
or 4 moves/trans/day - and we probably need 4
preparation/installation crews (unless these
functions can be reduced from the estimates of 30 minutes
which Max has to 15 minutes in which case we make do with
2 crews)
--------------------------------------------------------
Is a total of 4 moves/day enough??
For the largest configurations whether the proposed scheme
is OK depends critically on what
loaded speed be achieved. In a Y+ design the longest moves
are 10-12km, so a speed greater than 10km/hr is needed. The
desired target loaded speed of 20km/hr is then well within
requirements. However In memo 280 (Radford) for instance
an 'effective' (including detours, start and stop)
loaded speed of 7.5km/hr and a ring array
was assumed which then argued for more transporters to make the
reconfigurations for the largest arrays in a reasonable time.
Using continuous reconfiguration in most intermediate
configurations a rate of reconfiguration
of 4 antennas/move day is adequate. A 'Full cycle' in and
out - takes of order 306 moves (see todays memo 419
by Otarola and Holdaway). Hence at 4 ant/move day, going
full speed the array can go through all configurations
in 76 days (4.8 cycles/year!). More realistically I think would be
to make 4 moves every 2 - 2.5 days, which realistically allows two
full cycles per year. The other days the transporter
and crews could be used to ferry antennas to the OCF
or do general maintainence.
However in the compact arrays from the configuration
point of view it may be desirable to have significantly larger
move rates (i.e. 6 - 8 moves/day). The reason is that
the intermediate configurations between say the most compact
and the first N-S extended array may not be as useful as
for the intermediates.
More information about the Alma-config
mailing list