[Difx-users] complex support
Adam Deller
adeller at astro.swin.edu.au
Mon Feb 8 15:43:13 EST 2021
Hi Jayce,
Yep, so if you give the LWA 392 channels and an LO offset of -0.00000588,
and the VLA 320 channels, then you should have everything matched up.
Cheers,
Adam
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 04:18, Jayce Dowell <jdowell at unm.edu> wrote:
> Hi Adam and Chris,
>
> The VLA is outputting 8 MHz of bandwidth centered at 76 MHz and the LWA
> is 9.8 MHz of bandwidth centered at (76 MHz - 5.588 mHz). To answer
> Chris' earlier question, yes, both data sets are in VDIF format (if I
> can figure out how to correctly convert the LWA data).
>
> Jayce
> --
> On 2/7/21 3:33 PM, Adam Deller wrote:
> > * [EXTERNAL]*
> >
> > **
> > Hi Jayce,
> >
> > Just to expand on what Chris wrote, if you give the exact centre
> > frequency and bandwidth for the LWA and VLA, it would be easy to let you
> > know how DiFX can be set up to support correlation of the over-lapping
> > portion of the bands. As Chris said, this would be implemented using
> > "zoom" bands (which select a subset of channels) after configuration the
> > spectral resolution of the VLA and LWA to match. If the centre
> > frequencies are convenient, then this can be done pretty easily. If
> > they are separated by an unfortunate amount, though, you need to either
> > go to very high spectral resolution (in order to get the centre
> > frequencies of the channels to match, in addition to their widths) or
> > alternatively one can use the "LO offset" functionality in DiFX to
> > effectively tweak the centre frequency of one of the bands slightly to a
> > more convenient value, enabling lower spectral resolution to be used.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Adam
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 09:11, Phillips, Chris (CASS, Marsfield)
> > <Chris.Phillips at csiro.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jayce
> >
> > I'm working the data from the Long Wavelength Array and I am trying
> > to see if we can move from our homegrown correlator to DiFX. The
> > two modes I need to support are a LWA-only mode with homogeneous
> > data and an "eLWA" mode with heterogeneous data that combines the
> > LWA stations with the VLA 4-band system. For the LWA-only mode I
> > have 4+4-bit complex voltage data from two 19.6 MHz wide spectral
> > windows. I am currently converting these data from the LWA format
> > into two VDIF files, one per window, for correlation with DiFX. My
> > .input file describes the data as:
> > >
> > > DATA FORMAT: INTERLACEDVDIF/0:1
> > > QUANTISATION BITS: 4
> > > DATA FRAME SIZE: 7872
> > > DATA SAMPLING: COMPLEX_DSB
> > > DATA SOURCE: FILE
> > >
> >
> > I have never personally tested complex_dsb data with interlaced
> > vdif. I have no idea if there could be any “interaction” with the
> > VDIF interleaving and the specific data type (I would have thought
> > not, but you never know).
> >
> > The issue could also be with interpreting the interlaced VDIF, not
> > the complex double sideband.
> >
> > Once you have tested using trunk, not the released version, I would
> > try and use some of the vdifio utilities to try and convert the
> > interlaced VDIF into plain VDIF - either extracting out one thread,
> > or merging into multichannel single thread VDIF. You would obviously
> > need to update the DIFX .input (and or .v2d) file and vexfile to
> > match the new setup.
> >
> > I would also be using the m5access tools to do things like make the
> > autocorrelation (both before and after fiddling with the data
> > layout). Check DIFX gives the same auto shape as you get with
> > m5spec. If you use a modulated noise source, folding the data
> > (m5fold) on the period of the noise cal can be very informative
> > also. Also look at the headers and check that the # frames/sec etc
> > are what you expect (before and after merging threads etc). If you
> > decide it is the interlacing is the issue, I suspect you will need
> > to discuss with Walter.
> >
> >
> > > I am less sure about DiFX supporting our eLWA mode. For this we
> > have the same 4+4-bit complex voltage data from the LWA stations but
> > with a bandwidth of 9.8 MHz. We are combining this with 4-bit real
> > voltages from the VLA with 8 MHz of bandwidth and a slightly
> > different frequency setup. We currently process these data by
> > shifting the center frequency of the LWA data to match that of the
> > VLA, running two F-engines with different channelization to arrive
> > at the same channel width for both data sources, and then cross
> > correlate what overlaps. Is this mode something that DiFX supports?
> > >
> >
> > Can you represent this data as VDIF? If you you can probably handle
> > the different setup using zoom bands. However if this can be done
> > will really depend on the EXACT setup. Basically you need to be able
> > to channelise the two setups with the same final frequency
> > resolution (ie different FFT sizes will be needed, with the ratio of
> > the FFT size matching the ratio of the bandwidth difference. But the
> > sky frequency of the frequency points out of the FFT need to match
> > exactly (ie even if you could achieve the same frequency resolution,
> > if the fine channels are offset by 1/3 of a channel you will have
> > problems (if that offset is a simple integer ratio, you can just use
> > a higher frequency resolution)
> >
> > I hope this makes sense.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > !=============================================================!
> > A/Prof. Adam Deller
> > ARC Future Fellow
> > Centre for Astrophysics & Supercomputing
> > Swinburne University of Technology
> > John St, Hawthorn VIC 3122 Australia
> > phone: +61 3 9214 5307
> > fax: +61 3 9214 8797
> >
> > office days (usually): Mon-Thu
> > !=============================================================!
>
>
--
!=============================================================!
A/Prof. Adam Deller
ARC Future Fellow
Centre for Astrophysics & Supercomputing
Swinburne University of Technology
John St, Hawthorn VIC 3122 Australia
phone: +61 3 9214 5307
fax: +61 3 9214 8797
office days (usually): Mon-Thu
!=============================================================!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/difx-users/attachments/20210209/81797004/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Difx-users
mailing list