[wfc] Re: Next: Checksum proposal (revisited)
Arne Henden
aah at nofs.navy.mil
Thu Nov 14 14:26:06 EST 2002
Rob, our of the "several million" frames, how many had
errors that were caught with the checksum? And on what media?
Arne
Rob Seaman wrote:
> Arne says:
>
>
>>After handling several hundred thousand CCD frames, the only ones
>>I found corrupted were *really* corrupted and were obvious.
>
>
> And after handling several million CCD and IR frames, checksum
> verification has left me quite confident that those files were not
> corrupted. A checksum is precisely a mechanism for making subtle
> corruptions more obvious. Files that pass verification benefit from
> the added level of trust - an added value perhaps even greater than
> the detection of the rare failures.
More information about the wfc
mailing list