[mmaimcal] Agenda

[Bryan Butler]

while i agree with this in principle (putting the ACA on the other side 
of the compact array (CA) from the control building (CB)) - shouldn't we 
also strive to make the CB RFI-quiet?  if you've got radiation streaming 
out of the CB that could affect the ACA, then it's certainly going to 
also affect the main array when in the CA, and this seems an 
unacceptable situation to me.

	-bryan


On 10/25/05 14:32, Dick Sramek wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Don't forget to consider that we should want the ACA a far as possible 
> from the control building to minimize the RFI from the correlator (and 
> possible future high speed computing equipment).  Most the time the 50 
> element bilateral array will be dispersed with few if any elements 
> within 500 or 1000 meters of the control bldg.  However, the ACA will 
> always be where it is.
> 
> An ACA location near the compact configuration is probably desired, but 
> on the side away form the control bldg would be best.
> 
> ..DS..
> 
> Mark Holdaway wrote:
> 
>>
>> A short note on where to put the ACA,
>> in progress,
>>
>>   -M
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmaimcal mailing list
>> mmaimcal at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/mmaimcal
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmaimcal mailing list
> mmaimcal at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/mmaimcal