[mmaimcal] forwarded message from Stephane Guilloteau
Steven T. Myers
smyers at cv3.cv.nrao.edu
Fri Mar 24 14:01:53 EST 2000
In discussions on subarrays with Larry, I proposed that subarrays be
divided into two types:
"Hard" subarrays - a group of antennas that require a single
independently tunable first LO
"Soft" subarrays - a group of antennas that share a first LO tuning
with another subarray, but which may use different
2nd LO settings (which run off a fixed reference)
or other system controls (eg. correlator settings).
I would agree that a sufficient number of Hard subarrays would be 4, as
many of the cases I presented in previous mails could be dealt with
as Soft subarrays (in conjunction with a simultaneous Hard subarray).
This is Case #1 that Stephane proposes. Note we would routinely be
operating with 2-3 Hard subarrays (eg. VLBI,Main Interf,Sec Interf for
second line band or transient studies) so having an extra available would
likely meet our projected needs.
I am not sure if we need to distinguish between the correlator control
and the rest of the system (Stephane's Cases 2 and 3) as different Soft
subarray modes. Could we set both of these specs to 8 to simplify?
Or is there a good reason to have Case 2 be only 6, such as complications
regarding Phase Switching and/or correlator binning (for sideband
separation with DSB mixers)? I would marginally prefer to set the
Soft subarray limit (correlator and system) to a uniform maximum of 8.
I see no problem with the proposed limits, namely the critical Hard
subarray (Case 1) limit of a maximum of 4 simultaneous independently
tunable first LO signals.
-Steve
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|:| Steven T. Myers |:| Associate Scientist |:|
|:| National Radio Astronomy Observatory |:| |:|
|:| P.O. Box O |:| 1003 Lopezville Rd. |:|
|:| Socorro, NM 87801 |:| Ph: (505) 835-7294 |:|
|:| smyers at nrao.edu |:| FAX: (505) 835-7027 |:|
|:| http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/~smyers |:| |:|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Al Wootten wrote:
> Comments?
>
More information about the mmaimcal
mailing list