[mmaimcal] distant Milky Way?
Simon Radford
sradford at nrao.edu
Fri Jan 29 19:40:49 EST 1999
So how far out could we see the Milky Way in CO? OK, here goes:
1) Take the array sensitivity goals listed in the slide from the
standard talk for a 25 km/s channel
freq 90 140 230 345 650 GHz
dS 2.1 2.2 2.6 3.5 8.6 mJy sqrt(s)
2) The approximate CO(1-0) luminosity and line width are
(Solomon, Downes, Radford, & Barrett 1997 ApJ 478, 144)
L'co = 10^8.5 K km/s pc^2 and
delta V = 300 km/s.
In these units, you get the luminosity of any other
CO line simply by multiplying by the intrinsic brightness
temperature ratio of the lines. I'll make the (gross) assumption
that all lines of interest have the same brightness temperature.
This probably overestimates the luminosity of the higher
lines.
3) The line luminosity and line flux are related by
(Solomon, Downes, & Radford 1992 ApJ, 398, L29)
L' = (c^2/2k) (S delta V) [freq(obs)]^-2 D_L^2(1+z)^-3.
We can invert to get the maximum distance of a detecatble
source,
X = D_L^2/(1+z)^3 = [L'/delta V] [freq(obs)]^2 /(c^2/2k) G dS.
Here G is the "significance" of the detection in each
channel, i. e., we don't want 1 sigma detections, but
more like 5 sigma. So for G=5, we get
freq 90 140 230 345 650 GHz
X 2.5 5.8 13.2 22.0 31.8 x 10^4 Mpc^2 in 1 min
19.3 44.7 102 171 246 in 1 hour
54.7 126 298 482 697 in 8 hour
Note the scaling here. D_L^2 ~~ 1/dS ~~ sqrt(int time),
so long integrations are a tough row to hoe [D ~~ t^0.25].
4) The luminosity distance is a messy formula
(e. g., Weinberg 1972, p485, eq 15.3.24),
D_L = (c/H0)/q^2 [zq + (q-1)(-1+sqrt(2qz+1))].
Here are tables of D_L and X = D_L^2/(1+z)^3
z \ q 0.05 0.25 0.5
0.01 40 40 40 Mpc
0.03 122 121 121
0.1 419 414 409
0.3 1370 1320 1280 D_L
1 5810 5210 4860
3 26900 20100 16000
10 170000 90400 61400
z \ q 0.05 0.25 0.5
0.01 1.6 1.6 1.6 x 10^3 Mpc^2
0.03 13.5 13.5 13.4
0.1 132 129 126
0.3 851 799 743 X
1 4260 3390 2740
3 11300 6310 3990
10 21800 6130 2830
5) Assume there is always a suitable CO line
at any given observing frequency. Then
compare the tables for X in (2) and (4).
In 1 hour, at 230 GHz, we should be able to
detect an (unresolved) Milky Way at 0.3 < z < 1,
depending on q, at 5 sigma significance in a 10
channel spectrum.
Pulling out all the stops, i. e., an 8 hour
integration and average all 10 channels,
pushes us up to X = 9120 x 10^3 Mpc^2 at
230 GHz, which is a pretty interesting regime.
This was, no doubt, the basis of the claim
in various science reports that we could
see the Milky Way at z = 1. But it will be
hard work.
Also, ultraluminous galaxies are 30-50 more
luminous, with intrinsic L' <= 10^10.2 K km/s
pc^2. So these ought to be easier to detect.
Comments, please.
Simon
More information about the mmaimcal
mailing list