[Gb-ccb] ping
Richard Lacasse
rlacasse at nrao.edu
Mon Nov 7 15:11:10 EST 2005
Martin,
Just to close the loop, it turns out I made a mistake in designing the
cable. Instead of
Binary ID Cable harness
--------- -------------
00 The lab cable
01 1cm receiver.
10 3mm receiver.
11 A spare cable
as you had originally specified, it wound up
Binary ID Cable harness
--------- -------------
00 The lab cable
01 3mm receiver.
10 1cm receiver.
11 A spare cable
The cleanest thing to do is for me to fix my mistake. In just a few
minutes, both the cable documentation will match your original
specification, and hopefully it will boot up as ccb1cm.
Rich
Martin Shepherd wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>
>> verified that all of the monitoring information looks fine. The only
>> discrepancy is that the cable ID is currently 0.
>
>
> Now ccb_demo_client indicates that the cable ID is back to being 2,
> which is supposedly the ID of the 3mm cable. Note that if this is
> simply a matter of the cable ID pins being in the opposite order, then
> I can always change the IP assignment table to assign cable ID 2 to
> the 1cm receiver, and cable ID 1 to the 3mm receiver.
>
> Martin
>
More information about the gb-ccb
mailing list