[Fwd: [Gb-ccb] Power supplies for CCB]

Richard Lacasse rlacasse at nrao.edu
Tue Oct 11 08:43:50 EDT 2005


Roger,

Roger Norrod wrote:

> Rich,
> 
> It sounds like a good idea.  My only concern is the extra 12-15? lbs.
> counter-levered off the receiver turret mounting plate.  But if Galen is OK
> with it, I am too.

Yes, that was a prime concern of mine as well.  Fortunately Galen had the 
foresight to add extra bracing at the bottom of the receiver.  That was the 
reason he was ok with the extra weight.

Rich
> 
> Roger
> 
> 
> At 08:02 AM 10/11/2005 -0400, Richard Lacasse wrote:
> 
>>Galen, Roger, Bob,
>>
>>The CCB group has changed its thinking on power supply mounting.  This was 
>>triggered by the calculated, large IR drop in the original scheme.  I've 
>>discussed this new scheme verbally with Galen and Randy who, off the top of 
>>their heads, see no problem.  Could all of you give this some thought today 
>>and let me know if you see any problems.  The original message is appended 
>>below.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Rich
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gb-ccb mailing list
> gb-ccb at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/gb-ccb
> 





More information about the gb-ccb mailing list