[Gb-ccb] Caltech Backend Telecon Monday 07 July 4pm EDT
Richard Lacasse
rlacasse at nrao.edu
Thu Jul 3 21:58:37 EDT 2003
All,
Martin Shepherd wrote:
>
>>Seems quite attractive for noise abatement on the
>>digital signals. If I recall the earlier meeting, we decided that the
>>optos were an unnecessary feature. Maybe we should do it, since it is
>>pretty cheap and a definite win.
>
>
> That would be fine with me. However, assuming that by opto-isolation,
> we are talking about optic fibres, rather than opto-isolator chips and
> wires, the feasibility of this would presumably hinge on the
> availability of fibre-connectors with a metal screen going right up to
> the borders of the fibre. I'll see what I can find.
>
All I had in mind were wires and opto-isolator chips. A differential driver
would drive a shielded twisted pair and at the far end there would be a
termination network and opto-isolator chip. No current has to flow through the
grounds or power supplies of the end with the opto-isolator chip, so shield
currents are minimal.
Rich
More information about the gb-ccb
mailing list