[fitswcs] FITS WCS Time Paper
patrick.wallace at stfc.ac.uk
patrick.wallace at stfc.ac.uk
Thu Mar 22 05:55:25 EDT 2012
Steve Allen wrote:
> Thus the text specifically directs the reader to read the GPS
> Interface Specification.
Yes, but hardly anyone will: lay readers won't, and it is old
hat to time experts. Even I became inattentive by the time I
reached p94 or so.
The point I was trying to make is that the paper can afford to be
more helpful to readers. It has already mentioned that GPS is
more or less TAI-19s, and it can be said again here. And the
statement "GPS time is only required to match UTC to within a
microsecond" would not be harmed by adding a preamble "The
fractional part of" or something of the kind. Moreover, the
statement "That is to emphasize that GPS time is *not* defined in
terms of TAI" seems redundant, given that UTC is itself defined in
terms of TAI. I would write this:
GPS time is defined by the document "ICD-GPS-200, Revision C with
IRNs 1 through 5". Note that GPS time is aligned to a specific
UTC(USNO) epoch, 19s behind TAI, with the fractional part
matching UTC(USNO) to within a microsecond.
Incidentally the introduction to the appendix contains the typo:
"there are a more subtle issues"
Patrick Wallace
____________________________________________________________________
Space Science & Technology Department +44-1235-531198
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Harwell Oxford
Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX, UK Patrick.Wallace at stfc.ac.uk
____________________________________________________________________
More information about the fitswcs
mailing list