[fitswcs] History question about "UTC"
Patrick Wallace
ptw at star.rl.ac.uk
Thu Mar 29 01:24:54 EDT 2007
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Steve Allen wrote:
> ...for further oral histories I would also direct historians at
> Seidelmann and McCarthy.
I asked Dennis McCarthy about this and he replied:
> ...I suspect that the abbreviation follows from the suite of UT versions
> that were available, i.e. UT0, UT1, UT2 ... UTC. Recall that UT2 was an
> attempt to arrive at an "astronomical" uniform time before we settled on
> Caesium.
>
> I do know that "Coordinated Universal Time" was first used to describe
> the version of UT that RGO and USNO "coordinated." It began when they
> had the idea that the changes made to clocks (quartz crystals at the
> time) to bring them closer to the astronomical time (UT2) should somehow
> be coordinated between the two observatories. Hence the name,
> "Coordinated Universal Time." Up to that time individual observatories
> adjusted clocks as they saw fit in order to bring them into alignment
> with UT2. It also coincided with the coordination agreements between
> USNO and RGO regarding the almanacs.
>
> I have no reason to believe the wikipedia urban legend.
He says he may dig further, and I shall forward Steve's contribution to
him.
Patrick Wallace
____________________________________________________________________________
Space Science & Technology Department Internet: P.T.Wallace at rl.ac.uk
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Tel: +44-1235-445372
Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QX Fax: +44-1235-446362
United Kingdom
____________________________________________________________________________
More information about the fitswcs
mailing list