[fitswcs] I've got this FITS WCS matrix
Malcolm J. Currie
mjc at star.rl.ac.uk
Tue Aug 17 11:55:54 EDT 2004
I've been given some Gemini NIRI data. The WCS headers are listed
below.
CTYPE1 = 'RA---TAN' / the coordinate type for the first axis
CRPIX1 = 1281.62863446163 / x-coordinate of reference pixel
CRVAL1 = 0.698405727933413 / first axis value at ref pixel
CTYPE2 = 'DEC--TAN' / the coordinate type for the second axis
CRPIX2 = 433.151678256953 / y-coordinate of reference pixel
CRVAL2 = 35.8161778878783 / second axis value at ref pixel
CD1_1 = 6.02715759044019E-06 / partial of first axis coord w.r.t. x
CD1_2 = 1.27956486107373E-08 / partial of first axis coord w.r.t. y
CD2_1 = -1.6056794631393E-08 / partial of second axis coord w.r.t. x
CD2_2 = -5.96793770760736E-06 / partial of second axis coord w.r.t. y
Now for the purpose of registration in a pipeline I need to know the
rotation from this CD matrix to determine the approximate locations of
the source after dithering. Using Equation 191 from WCS Paper II, I
find that rho_a is 179.84 degrees and rho_b is 0.12 degrees to two
decimal places. What should one do in such cases?
Back in April I had recommended to the Gemini people that it excludes
shear from their model that fits to a grid, since the detector doesn't
have any. They just need a rotation, and scaling matrix (I did also say
that using CDELTn and PC matrix would be clearer). I believe that the
orientation is 180+/-small change, but I have data for one night where
the rotation came out as 89.3 for both rho_a and rho_b. Only one of
three nights do the two values agree within the errors and lie near 180
degrees.
Malcolm Currie
Starlink Project
More information about the fitswcs
mailing list