[fitswcs] Time WCS
Steve Allen
sla at ucolick.org
Fri Feb 1 16:55:46 EST 2002
On Fri 2002-02-01T16:35:47 -0500, William Pence hath writ:
> Representations of Time Coordinates in FITS
> 2. The second 4 characters of the CTYPEj keyword specify the reference
> frame of the time measurements. The same notation that is used for the
> SPECSYS keyword in the spectral coordinate system will be used:
>
> code location of time measurements
> ------- -----------------------------
> -SAT on a moving satellite
> -TOP at a fixed location on the earth
> -GEO geocentric
> -BAR barycentric
> -HEL heliocentric
> -LSR local standard of rest (kinematic)
> -LSD local standard of rest (dynamic)
> -GAL Galactocentric
> -LGR local group
> -SOU source reference frame
There will need to be provision for "satellites" that are actually
fixed to the surface of, say, Mars. The most recent draft of WCS
paper III has split the notion of SPECSYS into two keywords. This was
specifically to leave open the option of defining each of the original
frames as any location in the solar system.
> If CTYPEj = 'TIME-TOP' (topographic) then the following 3 keywords are
> required to provide the positional information that is needed to perform
> photon arrival time corrections:
>
> OBS-LAT latitude of time assignment position
> OBS-LONG longitude of time assignment position
> OBS-ELEV altitude of time assignment position
During various recent ruminations on paper III it was decided to
prefer body-centric Cartesian coordinates in meters. The notions of
longitude and latitude come with much baggage about ancient
terrestrial geodetic systems that would best be forgotten. Any GPS
unit with Cartesian readout mode gives a better answer than most maps.
> D. Optional keywords that define the exposure time of the observation:
>
> TELAPSE equals TSTOP - TSTART
> ONTIME total on-source exposure time; sum of GTIs
> LIVETIME equals ONTIME corrected for instrumental 'dead time' effects
> EXPOSURE equals LIVETIME corrected for any other effects (vignetting)
> TIMEDEL gives the inherent time resolution in the data in seconds,
> i.e., the smallest possible difference between successive
> time measurements.
These may want to be accompanied by something like TAVERAGE
representing the photon-weighted mindpoint of the observation.
--
Steve Allen UCO/Lick Observatory Santa Cruz, CA 95064
sla at ucolick.org Voice: +1 831 459 3046 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla
PGP: 1024/E46978C5 F6 78 D1 10 62 94 8F 2E 49 89 0E FE 26 B4 14 93
More information about the fitswcs
mailing list