[fitsbits] [Fwd: PV index perhaps wrong in version 3.0]
William Pence
William.Pence at nasa.gov
Wed Sep 10 12:36:11 EDT 2008
The question below regarding WCS keyword usage was sent to the FITS
support office. Is Table 8.1 in the FITS Standand incorrect? (See
http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/fits_standard.html ).
Should it state that LONPOLEa and LATPOLEa
are associated with PVi_3a and PVi_4a instead of PVi_1a and PVi_2a?
Bill
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: PV index perhaps wrong in version 3.0
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:35:34 +0200
L.S.,
Table 8.1 section 8, page 74 lists for the native longitude and latitude
of the celestial pole the keywords LONPOLEa= and LATPOLEa= which,
according to the table is equivalent to PVi_1a and PVi_2a.
However, in the same table these keywords were previously attached to
the fiducial point. Also Calabretta and Greisen use PVi_3a and PVi_4a in
their article 'Representations of celestial coordinates in FITS'.
Please can you inform me about what is right (i.e. standard FITS) in
this case?
--
____________________________________________________________________
Dr. William Pence William.Pence at nasa.gov
NASA/GSFC Code 662 HEASARC +1-301-286-4599 (voice)
Greenbelt MD 20771 +1-301-286-1684 (fax)
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list