[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification

[Mark Calabretta]

On Mon 2008/06/16 07:37:27 MST, Rob Seaman wrote
in a message to: Eric Greisen <egreisen at nrao.edu>, Mark Calabretta <mcalabre at at
     nf.csiro.au>
and copied to: FITSbits <fitsbits at nrao.edu>, William Pence <William.Pence at nasa.
     gov>

>Perhaps simply excise "(e.g. as is done for random groups data)"?  The  
>less said about random groups, the better :-)

As much as you optical types would like to get rid of them, random
groups are still valid FITS constructs and still widely used.  But
if you can think of a better contrast to the regular structure of
an image then I'd be happy to consider it.

Regards, Mark