[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification
Eric Greisen
egreisen at nrao.edu
Mon Jun 16 10:20:03 EDT 2008
Mark Calabretta wrote:
> On Thu 2008/06/12 14:13:44 -0400, William Pence wrote
> in a message to: FITSBITS <fitsbits at nrao.edu>
>
>> 1. Change the first sentence in section 8.1 from
>>
>> Rather than store world coordinates separately for each datum (e.g. as
>> is done for random groups data), the regular lattice structure of a
>> FITS image offers the possibility of defining rules for computing
>> world coordinates at each point.
>>
>> to
>>
>> Rather than store world coordinates separately for each datum, one
>> may define rules for computing world coordinates at each point.
>
> This change is not acceptable to me.
>
> The underlying basis of the world coordinate formalism is that the
> data has a regular structure, unlike random groups for example.
> Metrics don't come into it, at least not at this level.
>
> Regards, Mark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fitsbits mailing list
> fitsbits at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/fitsbits
I did not like the former wording since random groups does have a
regular lattice with WCS under the same rules as images along with the
random parameters which need not have rules.
Eric Greisen
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list