[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard

[Doug Tody]

Actually it should probably be 1.3, but 3.0 if you prefer!


On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Boud Roukema wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Doug Tody wrote:
> 
> > If we ever do a FITS 2.0 we should revisit this, but it is hard to
> > do more at this point for standard FITS than recommend that multiple
> > values not be allowed in the first place.  Once they are there you have
> > a problem.  - Doug
> 
> AFAIK we're already doing FITS 3.0 now, no need to revert to FITS 2.0:
>   http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/fits_draft.html
> 
> boud
> _______________________________________________
> fitsbits mailing list
> fitsbits at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/fitsbits
>