[fitsbits] Start of the 'INHERIT' Public Comment Period
Arnold Rots
arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
Fri Apr 6 15:32:49 EDT 2007
I must admit that I have serious misgivings about this particular
convention, as I think I stated in past discussions on the subject.
That's neither here nor there for the present discussion, but I
mention it to indicate that I feel it would be a bad idea to change
our mind on the principle of self-sufficient HDU headers.
Back to the present discussion:
I agree that it is a good idea to register the convention, but the
exchanges make me wonder whether we should add some components to the
registry for each convention:
- An analysis on general useability; i.e., an explicit discussion of
what will happen to a naive reader and what the prerequisites are for
proper understanding
- A general assessment as to whether the convention is recommended
for general use
The former could be provided by the submitter, the latter by the FWG.
- Arnold
Robert Hanisch wrote:
> > Nobody has suggested that the inherit convention shouldn't be documented
> > in the registry. The main issue that Bob raised earlier is whether the
> > IAUFWG (or anyone else for that matter) should be able to ofter any
> > advice, or recommendations, to potential new users of the convention,
> > beyond simply documenting what keywords are used by the convention.
> > This is a general issue that will affect a number of conventions, not
> > just the inherit convention. If the IAUFWG decides this would be
> > useful, then a mechanism for adding usage comments or recommendations
> > could be added to the Registry.
> >
> > Bill Pence
>
> Thanks Billl -- that is my main concern. There seem to be enough
> operational difficulties with this convention that I think potential
> adopters must be warned, and the caveat language we have right now is very
> non-specific. A FITS reader that does not understand the column limits
> convention, for example, would probably not cause any problems. A reader
> that does not understand a FOREIGN extension would simply ignore it. But a
> reader that encounters INHERIT, and manipulates headers with even simple
> copy operations, could make a bit of a mess.
>
> It is good to document what is out there, but we do not necessarily want to
> encourage its further adoption.
>
> Bob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fitsbits mailing list
> fitsbits at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/fitsbits
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold H. Rots Chandra X-ray Science Center
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory tel: +1 617 496 7701
60 Garden Street, MS 67 fax: +1 617 495 7356
Cambridge, MA 02138 arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
USA http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list