[fitsbits] Rice compression from the command line
Arnold Rots
arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
Thu Jul 20 12:57:51 EDT 2006
Mark,
Sorry, I must have mixed my numbers up.
I did it again and the difference is less stark:
FITS binary table
Uncompressed size: 49.7 MiB
compress uncompress
U+S/E(s) MiB (%) U+S/E(s)
------------------- ----------
gzip 55/ 61 29.7 (60%) 9/ 20
bzip2 135/ 140 26.2 (53%) 42/ 52
On a quiet SunBlade under Solaris 2.8
- Arnold
Mark Calabretta wrote:
>
> On Wed 2006/07/19 09:47:45 -0400, Arnold Rots wrote
> in a message to: Mark Calabretta <mcalabre at atnf.csiro.au>
> and copied to: Rob Seaman <seaman at noao.edu>, fitsbits at nrao.edu
>
> >I did a simple test using bzip2 for event files on Solaris.
> >Sure, I got 15% savings over gzip and I'm not worried about the
> >compression taking about twice as long. But the decompression taking
> >an order of magnitude longer than gunzip bothers me. Even if it is
> >more than compensated for by what's gained in transmission time, the
> >users' perception will be that things are worse, since decompression
>
> I agree that for data distribution it's the end-user experience that
> counts.
>
> However, I'm skeptical of the order of magnitude figure. The worst I
> saw was x3 in elapsed time which is what a user would perceive but
> typically it was between x1.5 and x2. Do you have figures for this
> test similar to those I sent?
>
> Cheers, Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> fitsbits mailing list
> fitsbits at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/fitsbits
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold H. Rots Chandra X-ray Science Center
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory tel: +1 617 496 7701
60 Garden Street, MS 67 fax: +1 617 495 7356
Cambridge, MA 02138 arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
USA http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list