[fitsbits] 64-bit integer comments
William Pence
William.D.Pence at nasa.gov
Fri May 13 11:36:56 EDT 2005
Thierry Forveille wrote:
> Unless somebody comes up with a project that will fly within 5 years
> and that needs 64 bits of dynamics in images, what's wrong with just
> waiting until some actual need occurs?
The projects I have dealt with typically make decisions about the format of
their FITS data products on time scales of weeks or months. The FITS
approval process on the other hand has traditionally operated on a time
scale of years. Even though we are working to make the FITS approval
process more efficient, it will never match the speed required by some
projects. Thus I think the onus is on us (the keepers of the FITS Standard)
to anticipate future needs in a timely manner.
This also misses the point that there are literally hundreds (if not
thousands) of individual students and researchers that write their own
relatively small analysis programs that read and write FITS data files. It
seems very plausible to me that at least some of these researchers would
find it convenient right now to write out a histogram of Integer*8 values to
a FITS image, perhaps as an intermediate file that will then be read in and
further analyzed by a second program. I would argue we should be working to
ensure that the FITS "toolbox" contains all the capabilities that reasonably
might be useful to researchers in doing their work as easily and efficiently
as possible. This seems more useful to me than telling those researchers
"no, you cannot simply write I*8 values into a FITS image; If you really
must store I*8 values then you must spend more time and effort to develop
more complicated software to write them into a column of a binary table".
Bill Pence
--
____________________________________________________________________
Dr. William Pence William.D.Pence at nasa.gov
NASA/GSFC Code 662 HEASARC +1-301-286-4599 (voice)
Greenbelt MD 20771 +1-301-286-1684 (fax)
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list