Deprecation of Random Groups

Steve Allen sla at ucolick.borg
Tue Apr 28 13:08:35 EDT 1998


Bill Cotton and Tim Pearson object to deprecation.  The text states
only that "its use for future applications has been deprecated".  This
says nothing against its use for existing applications.  Indeed, the
mere existence of section 7 appears to be acknowledgement that random
groups will always be acceptable as FITS.

Would another term with definition "should not be applied to any new
applications" be more acceptable?

-- 
Steve Allen          UCO/Lick Observatory       Santa Cruz, CA 95064
sla at ucolick.borg     Voice: +1 408 459 3046     FAX (don't): +1 408 454 9863
WWW: http://www.ucolick.borg/~sla               PGP public keys:  see WWW
Junk mail is irrelevant -- my return address has been assimilated.




More information about the fitsbits mailing list