FITS standard
Arnold Rots
arots at xebec.harvard.edu
Thu Apr 16 17:07:10 EDT 1998
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> The new FITS standard draft seems pretty reasonable. I may not have been
> paying attention to the Y2K discussion enough,
You got that right! ;-)
> but I am puzzled by the
> statement in 5.4.2.1 that UTC shall be used for the DATE keyword
> 'for all data sets created
> on earth'. Is it felt that there are practical difficulties in realizing
> UTC for computers not on earth? This seems unlikely to the accuracy
> required by the DATE keyword; it is also not a frivolous question;
> there are enough laptops flying on Shuttle and Mir missions which might
> in principle store their data in FITS. I suggest removing the 'on earth'
> qualification (or replacing it by 'in the solar system', since I can
> see there might be simultaneity issues for interstellar probes...)
You took the two easy examples: low earth orbit and outside the solar
system. As you probably have guessed, the 'for all data sets created
on earth' was added later. It was argued (correctly, I believe) that
on the earth's surface, UTC is well defined and useful, but even on a
nearby planet like Mars it is not clear that UTC would be the system
of choice - TDB might be better.
What you see is the text as adopted by the IAU FWG displaying a
traditional FITS solution strategy: The convention is specific where
we know that it is sensible to do so. In all other situations you are
free to follow the same convention if that works well; if not, then at
least we didn't paint ourselves into a corner - you can use something
that makes sense, as long as you document it in the comment field.
- Arnold Rots
>
> - Jonathan McDowell
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold H. Rots AXAF Science Center
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory tel: +1 617 496 7701
60 Garden Street, MS 81 fax: +1 617 495 7356
Cambridge, MA 02138 arots at head-cfa.harvard.edu
USA http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list