[evlatests] Changing P-band Dipole orientations
Rob Long
rlong at nrao.edu
Wed Sep 11 17:43:36 EDT 2024
What Rick mentioned is correct. Unfortunately, it is difficult to keep
the dipole aligned "perfectly", dependent on which direction the
sub-reflector was last rotating. There are nylon guide blocks at the
apex of the antenna trombone assembly which do loosen/wear over time and
allow more slop in the dipole orientation. CCW vs CW rotation of the
sub-reflector can leave the dipole in slightly different positions.
Usually, this is within a couple of degrees.
Rob
On 9/11/2024 10:12 AM, Rick Perley via evlatests wrote:
> I noted yesterday some discrepant dipole orientations, and noted that
> I had the impression these were worse than at earlier times.
>
> By happenstance, I'm calibrating some old (2019) P-band data for Tracy
> Clarke, which allows me to judge the correctness of that statement.
>
> The statement is *wrong*. Misorientations were worse in 2019 than now.
>
> Tracy's data were taken twice – in March and in September of 2019.
> The distribution of orientations were in fact worse than now, and also
> were very different. Antennas misoriented now were better (or worse)
> in 2019. Indeed, the correlation between the two 2019 observations is
> not very strong.
>
> I believe these conclusions are not surprising, as the dipoles are
> known to be subject to rotation caused by the rotating subreflector.
> Perhaps Rob Long can confirm this statment.
>
> Rick
>
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/evlatests/attachments/20240911/88767446/attachment.html>
More information about the evlatests
mailing list