[evlatests] A remarkable gain change at P-band

[Ken Sowinski]

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, Paul Demorest via evlatests wrote:

> Rick, I'd guess maybe WIDAR was reconfigured causing the original 
> requantizer ("digital") gains to be lost.  These gains are recorded in 
> the SysPower table so this should be easy to verify.  T304 attenutators 
> probably didn't change..  Someone should take a close look at whatever 
> modifications were done regarding removing the pointing scans, to see if 
> unnecessary widar configuration calls remained in the script.

Yes, this is it.  I am not sure if the blame lies in the hologrphy package
or in the script.  They interact in not very obvious (to me) ways.  The
simple correction for now is to add a short scan  before each beam cut
to set the gains again.

I think it is most likely to be the script.  I seem to remember that
it was organized to assume that after a holography scan LO and correlator
setups would be in unknown states and would have to be explicitly set
again before doing anything else.

> -Paul
>
> ________________________________________
> From: evlatests <evlatests-bounces at listmgr.nrao.edu> on behalf of Rick Perley via evlatests <evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu>
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2024 2:12 PM
> To: Rob Long; evlatests
> Subject: Re: [evlatests] A remarkable gain change at P-band
>
> All setups were done according to instructions:  After moving to the source at a different band, a 1-minute on-source observation, at P-band, was executed for the T304 gains, followed by a 10-second observation to setup  the digital gain.  These worked as expected (so far as I can tell).
>
> Rick
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rob Long <rlong at nrao.edu>
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2024 2:08 PM
> To: Rick Perley <rperley at nrao.edu>; evlatests <evlatests at nrao.edu>
> Subject: Re: [evlatests] A remarkable gain change at P-band
>
>
> Did the T304s reset attenuators between runs? I'm sure they did when you went to a calibrator. So much interference in P-band, I wouldn't be shocked to see significantly different attenuator settings from run to run.
>
>
> Rob
>
>
> On 10/28/2024 1:58 PM, Rick Perley via evlatests wrote:
> I ran a holography test last night (to assist Tracy Clarke in her characterizations of the P-band primary beam).  The SB consisted of four single cuts through the primary beam.  The four cuts were:  horizontal, vertical, and two cuts at 45 degree angles.
>
> Each holography cut begins and ends with a short on-source calibrator observation.
>
> A most remarkable thing happened between the first two holography cuts in last night's test:
>
> The amplitude changed, for all antennas.  Some amplitudes went up, others went down.  For some antennas, the change was barely noticeable.  For others, it was as large as a factor of six.  (!).  The changes were not the same in the two polarizations.
>
> The effect is due to a gain chang, and not to any antenna or subreflector position error —it is seen in the switched power monitors —both PSum and PDif.
>
> The PSum values, at the beginning of the run, and through to the end of the first holography observation, were normal at near 14 counts.
>
> This gain change occurred only after the first holography scan — about ten to fifteen minutes into the observation.   For all other beam cuts, the gain remained constant (at the wrong power levels).
>
> Any idea what happened?
>
> Rick
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu<mailto:evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu>
> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
>