[evlatests] RFI sweep June 2015

[Rick Perley]

     Upon reflection, I rescind my earlier support for a finer frequency 
resolution.  The BW of the interfering signals should not be different 
than similar RFI signals at higher frequencies.  125 kHz should be 
sufficient.

     But, following my usual dictum that 'more is better',  having more 
channels is certainly not a bad thing, and might reveal something useful.

     Rick

On 07/08/2015 04:46 PM, Dan Mertely wrote:
> I would find 125 KHz res to be adequate for our signal
> ID work.  -Mert
>
> On 7/8/2015 1:22 PM, Ken Sowinski wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Huib Intema (NRAO) wrote:
>>
>>> Since P-band is a standard observing band, and in terms of RFI not
>>> much worse than other low frequency bands, it would be useful to
>>> include it in tests like this. This is relevant for both continuum
>>> observing as (future) spectral line observing.
>>
>> I will extend the sweep to P band.  I assume the same spectral
>> resolution as that used for all the other bands is adequate?
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> evlatests mailing list
>> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
>> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests