[evlatests] 10-second tuning failures at X-band
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Mon Aug 31 10:53:54 EDT 2015
Never, ever, does this appear in the middle of a scan. Only at the
beginning (95% of the time), or at the end.
On 08/31/2015 08:48 AM, Walter Brisken wrote:
>
> If it is a correlator setup issue, it probably is happening within
> scans as well, correct? If so, things would probably not look too bad
> (the previous model would just be extended another 10 seconds I
> presume), but there would be differences and this would break
> accountability of the delay model. Might show up best at high
> frequencies on long baselines pointing near zenith where the second
> derivative of the delay model is greatest.
>
> -Walter
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Ken Sowinski wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Vivek Dhawan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds lke L302's failing to lock for 10 sec, a fairly common
>>> transient
>>> effect on 1% of the 224 units. But why it is only at X band I cannot
>>> explain
>>> - I assume you changed bands many times after the reference pointing?
>>
>> I don't think so; that would break two IFs at a time. My money
>> is on the distribution of current delay and phase models and
>> sideband information within the station board. Tracking it down
>> will probably not be easy. For Rick: when it fails for an IF,
>> is it true that all subbands for that IF behave the same way?
>>
>> Ken
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, August 31, 2015 08:26, Rick Perley wrote:
>>> | The calibrator survey run, taken last October, has revealed the
>>> | continued presence of short-lived tuning failures. The
>>> characteristics
>>> | are quite simple:
>>> | | 1) No fringes at the beginning of a scan, lasting exactly 10
>>> | seconds. After this interval, full-valued fringes abruptly occur.
>>> | Hence, this is not a pointing problem.
>>> | | 2) Roughly 20% of scans are affected, nearly always a single
>>> | antenna, occasionally two. This seems consistent with a random
>>> | process. There was no clear tendency for any particular antenna
>>> to fail
>>> | more often.
>>> | | 3) The four IFs failed independently, with equally
>>> likelihood --
>>> | failures are always on a single IF.
>>> | | 4) So far as I can determine, this problem only occurs at
>>> X-band.
>>> | (I have checked P, L, S, and C, so far).
>>> | | 5) The on-line flagging system (unsurprisingly) does not
>>> flag these
>>> | failures.
>>> | | These X-band observations followed X-band referenced
>>> pointing,
>>> | which utilized a different tuning and correlator configuration.
>>> | | There was also a single incidence (out of 182 scans) where
>>> the
>>> | *last* 10 seconds abruptly lost fringe power.
>>> | | | _______________________________________________
>>> | evlatests mailing list
>>> | evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
>>> | https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
>>> |
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> evlatests mailing list
>>> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
>>> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> evlatests mailing list
>> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
>> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
>>
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
More information about the evlatests
mailing list